Page tree

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 29 Next »

A specific interpretation workflow of pressure transition dynamics in terms of wellbore and formation properties of connected beddings. 

Despite the explicit name It does not necessarily refer to analysis of a stand-alone pressure transient and also cover the complex pressure histories with numerous pressure transitions.

Both downhole and surface pressure records can be a source of information recoverable through PTA

The quantitative interpretation of pressure transitions is based on pressure diffusion model.


Below are the major types of PTA:

DD – Drawdown survey 

BUS – Build-up survey 

FOS – Fall off survey

Injection Survey


Objectives



Primary deliverables
Conditional Deliverables
1

Assess current formation pressure

p_e



3

Assess skin-factor

S

Assess formation damage

Assess formation penetration

Identify fracture-network development around the well


4

Assess formation transmissibility

\sigma

Assess permeability k assuming flowing thickness h is known

Assess flowing thickness h assuming permeability k is known

Assess water-oil column assuming permeability k and flowing thickness h are both known


5

Assess minimum drainable volume around the well

V_\phi

Assess minimum hydrocarbon reserves around the well

Assess drainage area A around the well assuming flowing thickness h is known

Assess flowing thickness h assuming the drainage area A around the well is known


6

Identify boundary type: PSS, \, SS, \, BAFFLE

and assess its proximity r_e




7

Identify fracture presence and assess its size X_f




8

Assess the fracture opening threshold \delta P_{X_f}




9

Assess the presence r_{ext} of remote reservoir composition areas and its transmissibility \sigma_{ext}


Pick up the channel size/proximity

Pick up the oil-water front and its proximity

Pick up the oil-gas front and its proximity



Interpretation



Samples


Fig. 1. Transient responses in vertical producerFig. 2. Transient responses in horizontal producer


References





  • No labels