A proxy model of watercut YW in producing well with reservoir saturation s=\{ s_w, \, s_o, \, s_g \} and reservoir pressure p_e:
|
|
where
B_w(p_e) | Water formation volume factor | B_o(p_e) | Oil formation volume factor | s | Reservoir saturation \{ s_w, \, s_o, \, s_g \} |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M_{rw}(s) | Relative water mobility | M_{ro}(s) | Relative oil mobility | p_e | Current formation pressure |
\rho_w | Water density | \rho_o | Oil density | g | Standard gravity constant |
q_t | Total sandface flowrate | A | Cross-sectional flow area | \alpha | Deviation of flow from horizontal plane |
P_c(s) | capillary pressure |
If capillary effects are not high P_c \rightarrow 0 or saturation does not vary along the streamline substantially \displaystyle \frac{\partial s_w}{\partial r} \rightarrow 0, then \displaystyle \frac{\partial P_c}{\partial r} = \dot P_c \cdot \frac{\partial s_w}{\partial r} \approx 0.
If flow is close to horizontal \sin \alpha \rightarrow 0 then gravity effects are vanishing too: (\rho_w-\rho_o) \cdot g \cdot \sin \alpha \approx 0.
In these cases (1) simplifies to:
(3) | {\rm Y_{Wm}} = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{M_{ro}}{M_{rw}} \cdot \frac{B_w}{B_o} } = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{k_{ro}}{k_{rw}} \cdot \frac{\mu_w }{\mu_o } \cdot \frac{B_w}{B_o}} |
The models (1) and (3) can also be used in production analysis assuming homogeneous reservoir water saturation s_w:
(4) | s_w(t) = s_{wi} + (1-s_{wi}) \cdot \rm E_{Dow}(t) = s_{wi} + (1-s_{wi}) \cdot \rm RFO(t)/E_S |
where
\displaystyle {\rm RFO} = \frac{Q^{\uparrow}_O}{V_{\rm STOIIP}} | current oil recover factor |
Q^{\uparrow}_O | cumulative oil production |
V_{\rm STOIIP} | STOIIP |
E_S | sweep efficiency |
s_{wi} | initial water saturation |
s_{orw} | residual oil saturation to water sweep |
See Also
Petroleum Industry / Upstream / Subsurface E&P Disciplines / Well Testing (WT) / Flowrate Testing / Flowrate / Production Water cut (Yw)
[ Watercut Diagnostics / Watercut Fractional Flow plot ] [ Watercut Correlation @model ]
[ WOR ]