| Fig. 1. Dual-layer well schematic | 
  | 
  | 
  | ||||||
  | ||||||||
where
| Well | ||
|---|---|---|
q  | total subsurface flowrate of the well | |
J  | total well productivity Index | |
p_e  | apparent formation pressure of dual-layer formation | |
| Layer #1 | ||
p_{wf} = p_{wf, 1}  | bottom-hole pressure at Layer #1 top | |
q_1  | total subsurface flowrate of the Layer #1 | |
p_1  | formation pressure of the Layer #1 | |
J_1  | productivity Index of the Layer #1 | |
| Layer #2 | ||
p_{wf2} = p_{wf} + \delta p_2  | bottom-hole pr4essure at Layer #2 top | |
\delta p_2  | wellbore pressure loss between the tips of two layers | |
q_2  | total subsurface flowrate of the Layer #2 | |
p_2  | formation pressure of the Layer #2 | |
J_2  | productivity Index of the Layer #2 | |
In many practical cases one can safely assume:
| (5) | \delta p_2 = \rho \, g \, h | 
where
\rho  | wellbore fuid density | 
|---|---|
g  | gravity constant | 
h = TVDSS_1 - TVDSS_2  | true vertical height between k-th layer and reference layer k_{reff}  | 
The above equations are valid for both producers q>0 and injectors q<0.
See Also
Petroleum Industry / Upstream / Production / Subsurface Production / Subsurface E&P Disciplines / Field Study & Modelling / Production Analysis / Productivity Diagnostics
[ Production Technology / Well Flow Performance ]
[ Formation pressure (Pe) ] [ Multi-layer IPR ]
