...
In case injector W0 supports only one producer W1 , then both wells drain the same reservoir volume
LaTeX Math Inline |
---|
body | V_{\phi, 0} = V_{\phi, 1} |
---|
|
so that
LaTeX Math Block Reference |
---|
|
leads to:
...
In order to relate the UTR from numerical grid simulations or from deconvolution theory to the CRM injection share constants one need needs to implement a following trick:certain workflow.
- Collect true UTRs with the same LTR asymptotic.
- Perform two convolution tests in virtual space:
- Test #1 – DTR 11
- Calculate historically-averaged rate for each producer:
LaTeX Math Inline |
---|
body | \displaystyle q^*_k = \frac{1}{N_k} \sum_{m=1}^{N_k} q_k(t_m) |
---|
|
- Calculate DTR_11:
LaTeX Math Inline |
---|
body | \displaystyle p^*_{u, 11}(t) = p_{u, 11}(t) + \sum_{k \neq 1} p_{u, k1}(t) \cdot q^*_k |
---|
|
(meaning that all producers are working with constant rates , except producer W1 which is working with unit-rate and injector W0 which is shut-down )
- Test #2 – CTR 01
- Calculate historically-averaged rate for each producer:
LaTeX Math Inline |
---|
body | \displaystyle q^*_k = \frac{1}{N_k} \sum_{m=1}^{N_k} q_k(t_m) |
---|
|
- Calculate CTR_01:
LaTeX Math Inline |
---|
body | \displaystyle p^*_{u, 01}(t) = p_{u, 11}(t) + \sum_{k \neq 1} p_{u, k1}(t) \cdot q^*_k + p_{u, 01}(t) \cdot q^*_0 |
---|
|
(meaning that all producers are working with constant rates , except producer W1 which is working with unit-rate and injector W0 which is shut-down )
- qwe
Again it is important to note Again it is important to notew a difference between
- CRM assumptions (constant PI, constant drainage volumes with no flow boundaries and constant total compressibility) – which may or may not take place and hence may or may not make CRM applicable
...