Despite of terminological similarity there is a difference in the way Dynamic Modelling (DM),  Well Flow Performance (WFP) and Well Testing (WT) usually define formation pressure and productivity index.

The most typical definitions (although they do not cover the full variety of definitions referred in petroleum literature) are summarised in the table below:



WFP

Drain-area formation pressure estimate 
within the drainage area 

p_r = \frac{1}{A_e} \iint_{A_e} p(x,y,z) dS


WT

Drain-boundary formation pressure estimate 
along the boundary of drainage area 

p_e = \frac{1}{L_e} \int_0^{L_e} p(x,y,z) dl

where is the boundary of drainage area

DM

9-cell formation pressure

p_{e9, \ i,j} = \frac{1}{9} \sum_{k=i-1}^{i+1} \sum_{l=j-1}^{j+1} p_{k,l}


p_{e9, \ i,j} = \frac{1}{9} ( p_{i,j}
+ p_{i, \, j+1} + p_{i, \, j-1}
+ p_{i-1, \, j} + p_{i-1, \, j}
+ p_{i-1 \, j-1} + p_{i+1, \, j+1}
+ p_{i-1 \, j+1} + p_{i+1, \, j-1} )

for each fluid phase individually:





Sometimes the wrong estimations of flowrate stem form the wrong inputs ( or ).


See Also


Petroleum Industry / Upstream / Production / Subsurface Production / Well & Reservoir Management

Subsurface E&P Disciplines / Production Technology / Productivity Index