Page tree

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 34 Next »



Shaliness


The shales contain much higher concentration of radioactive minerals comparing to clean sands and carbonates.

This is why the most common way to quantify the shale content is the intensity of the natural gamma-ray (GR) emission.

The fist step is to normalize the actual GR-tool readings  GR_{log} to the reference values in clean rocks  GR_m and pure shales  GR_{sh} which is called Shale Index

(1) I_{GR}(l) = \frac{GR_{log}(l) - GR_m}{GR_{sh} - GR_m}

where  l – along-hole depth.

The model parameters  GR_{sh}  and   GR_m  are calibrated for each facies individually.

The shale index  I_{GR} is varying between 0 (for non-shally rocks) and 1 (for pure shales) but the actual shaliness may behave non-linearly between these extremes (especially for shallow, young reservoirs). 

This can be calibrated based on the available core data.



The table below summairzes some popular shaliness models:

#EquationAuthorRock TypeCorrelation database
1

V_{sh} = I_{GR}




2

V_{sh} = 0.083 \cdot (2^{3.7 I_{GR}} - 1)

Larionov (1969)Tertiary Jurassic rocksWest Siberia
3

V_{sh} = 1.7 - \sqrt{(3.38 - (I_{GR}+0.7)^2)}

Clavier (1971)

4


V_{sh} = \frac{ I_{GR}}{3 - 2 I_{GR}}

Stieber (1970)



5

V_{sh} = 0.33 \cdot (2^{2 I_{GR}} - 1)

Larionov (1969)Older RocksWest Siberia



The graphic image of different shale volume models is brought on Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Shale Volume Models.


Typical GR values in API are summarized on the table below:


Rock TypeGR, API
1Halite (NaCl)0
2Coal0
3Limestone5 – 10
4Sandstone10 – 20
5Dolomite10 – 20
6Shale80 – 140
7Mica100 – 170
8Silvite (KCl)500

References



  • No labels