Page tree

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

Despite of terminological similarity there is a big difference in the way Dynamic Modelling,  Well Flow Performance and Well Testing deal with formation pressure and flowrates which results in a difference in productivity index definition and corresponding analysis.

This difference is summarized in the table below:


Formation pressure, p

Flow rate, q

Producivity Index, J

DM

field-average pressure within the 9-cell area A_{e9}

(1) p_{e9, \ i,j} = \frac{1}{9} \sum_{k=i-1}^{i+1} \sum_{l=j-1}^{j+1} p_{k,l} = \frac{1}{9} ( p_{i,j} + p_{i, \, j+1} + p_{i, \, j-1} + p_{i-1, \, j} + p_{i-1, \, j} + p_{i-1 \, j-1} + p_{i+1, \, j+1} + p_{i-1 \, j+1} + p_{i+1, \, j-1} )

phase flowrate at sandface: \{ q_w, \, q_o, \, q_g \}

(each fluid phase separately)

phase productivity index:


J_ w = \frac{q_q}{p_r - p_{wf}} , J_o = \frac{q_o}{p_r - p_{wf}} , J_g = \frac{q_g}{p_r - p_{wf}}

WFP

field-average pressure within the drainage area A_e

(2) p_r = \frac{1}{A_e} \iint_{A_e} p(x,y,z) dS

surface component flowrate \{ q_W, q_O, q_G \}

(each fluid component separately)

and sometimes liquid flowrate q_{\rm liq} = q_W + q_O

fluid component productivity index:

J_W = \frac{q_W}{p_r - p_{wf}} , J_O = \frac{q_O}{p_r - p_{wf}} , J_G = \frac{q_G}{p_r - p_{wf}}

and sometimes liquid productivity index: J_{\rm liq} = \frac{q_{\rm liq}}{p_r - p_{wf}}

WT

average pressure value at the boudary of drainage area A_e

(3) p_e = \frac{1}{L_e} \int_0^{L_e} p(x,y,z) dl

where L_e is the boundary of drainage area A_e

total flowrate at sandface:

q_t = B_w \, q_W + B_o \, q_O + B_g \, ( q_G - R_s q_O) – for Black Oil

q_t = B_w \, q_W + \frac{B_o - R_s B_g}{1 - R_v R_s} \, q_O + \frac{B_g - R_v B_o}{1 - R_v R_s} \, q_G – for Volatile Oil

or \{ W, \, O, \, G \} pseudo-components of Compositional Model

total multiphase productivity index: J_t = \frac{q_t}{p_e - p_{wf}}

  • No labels