...
Excerpt |
---|
Pressure transient survey in producer during the pressure rise period caused by shutting well down or reducing its production rate. |
Shut-in survey after production period with a constant rate (see Fig. 1):
Image Added |
Fig 1. Horner test procedure |
Interpretation
...
Interpretation of BUS is based on:
- visual analysis of PTA diagnostic plot
- selecting diffusion model from PTA Type Library
- fitting selected diffusion model to pressure gauge data records
In some cases when:
both production
and shut-in period reach radial flow regime: ,
total duration of production and shut-in do not reach the boundary
one can uses Horner model which is a simplified version of BUS interpretation procedure and based on the following pressure diffusion model:
LaTeX Math Block |
---|
anchor | Horner_pwf |
---|
alignment | left |
---|
|
p_{wf}(\Delta t) = p_e - \frac{q_t}{4 \pi \sigma} \, \ln \left( 1 + \frac{T}{\Delta t} \right) |
The main features of Horner model are:
it provides reliable estimation of formation pressure
and formation transmissibility it does not require the knowledge of pressure diffusivity
(unlike the case of a drawdown test)it does not depend on diffusion model specifics as soon as IARF is developed during the test
it does not provide skin-factor estimation
The formula
LaTeX Math Block Reference |
---|
|
shows that pressure during the shut-in segment of Honer test is not dependant on skin-factor and pressure diffusivity.
The formation pressure
and transmissibility are estimated with LSQ regression: LaTeX Math Block |
---|
|
\left \{ p_{wf} \right \} = p_e - b \, \left \{ \ln \left( 1 + \frac{T}{\Delta t} \right) \right \} |
LaTeX Math Block |
---|
|
\sigma = \frac{q_t}{4 \pi b} |
Horner model is a good example of how a complicated problem of non-linear regression on three parameters
LaTeX Math Inline |
---|
body | \{ p_e, \, S, \, \sigma \} |
---|
|
with upfront knowledge of pressure diffusivity may sometimes be simplified to a fast-track linear regression on two parameters without any additional assumptions on reservoir properties.