...
LaTeX Math Block |
---|
| J_s(q_{\rm liq}) = \frac{q_{\rm liq}}{p_R-p_{wf}} |
|
for oil producer with liquid flowrate (water and oil at surface conditions) |
LaTeX Math Block |
---|
| J_s(q_G) = \frac{q_G}{p_R-p_{wf}} |
|
for gas producer with gas flowrate at surface conditions
|
LaTeX Math Block |
---|
| J_s(q_g) = \frac{q_{GI}}{p_{wf}-p_R} |
|
for gas injector with gas flowrate at surface conditions
|
LaTeX Math Block |
---|
| J_s(q_w) = \frac{q_{WI}}{p_R-p_{wf}} |
|
for water injector with water flowrate at surface conditions |
where
| field-average formation pressure within the drainage area of a given well: LaTeX Math Inline |
---|
body | p_R = \frac{1}{V_e} \, \int_{V_e} \, p(t, {\bf r}) \, dV |
---|
|
|
Based on these notions the general WFP – Well Flow Performance can be wirtten in universal form:
...
It can be interpreted as deterioration of near-reservoir zone permeability when the fluid velocity is high and modelled as rate-dependant skin-factor.
For 3-phase water-oil-gas flow the IPR analysis is perfomed on oil and watr components (see Fig. 4.1 and Fig. 4.2).
Note |
---|
Excerpt Include |
---|
| Definition specifics on formation pressure and productivity index in between Dynamic Modelling, Well Flow Performance and Well Tests |
---|
| Definition specifics on formation pressure and productivity index in between Dynamic Modelling, Well Flow Performance and Well Tests |
---|
nopanel | true |
---|
|
|
...