Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_R

field-average formation pressure within the drainage area

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyV_e
of a given well:
LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_R = \frac{1}{V_e} \, \int_{V_e} \, p(t, {\bf r}) \, dV

Water and Dead Oil IPR



Based on above defintions the general general WFP – Well Flow Performance can be wirtten in a general form:

...

providing that  

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq
 has a specific meaning and sign as per the table below:

LaTeX Math Inline
body-

for producer

LaTeX Math Inline
body+

for injector

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq=q_{\rm liq}=q_o+q_w

for oil producer

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq=q_g

for gas producer or injector

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq=q_w

for water injector or water-supply producer


The  Productivity Index can be constant or dependent on bottom-hole pressure pressure 

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_{wf}
  or equivalently on flowrate 
LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq
.

In general case of multiphase flow the PI 

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyJ_s
 features a complex dependance on bottom-hole pressure 
LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_{wf}
 (or equivalently on flowrate 
LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq
) which can be etstablished based on numerical simulations of multiphase formation flow.

Some analytical correlations can be used to approximate the numerical solutions and some of them are brought below. 

They are very helpful in practise to design a proper well flow optimization procedure.

These correaltions should be calibrated to the available well test data to set a up a customized WFP – Well Flow Performance model for a given formation.


Water and Dead Oil IPR

...


For a single layer formation with low-compressibility fluid (water or dead oil) the PI does not depend on drawdown (or flowrate) 

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyJ_s = \rm const
 and WFP – Well Flow Performance plot is reperented by a straight line (Fig. 1)

...

For gas producers, the fluid compressibility is high and formation flow in well vicinity becomes flow is essentially non-linear (deviating from Darcy) fot high flowrates, inflicting the downward trend on on the whole WFP – Well Flow Performance plot (Fig. 2).

...

Fig. 2. WFP – Well Flow Performance for dry gas producer or gas injector into a gas formation

In general case of saturated oil, the PI 

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyJ_s
 features a complex dependance on bottom-hole pressure 
LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_{wf}
( or flowrate 
LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq
) which can be etstablished based on numerical simulations of multiphase formation flow.

...

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_R > p_b

...






Saturated Oil IPR

...


For 2-phase oil-gas formation flow below bubble point 

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyP_{wf} < P_b
  the free gas slippage effects inflict inflicting the downward trend on at the right side of WFP – Well Flow Performance plot (Fig. 3).

...

Fig. 3. WFP – Well Flow Performance for 2-phase oil+gas production below and above bubble point


But when field-average formation pressure is above bubble-point 

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_R > p_b
 (which means that most parts of the drainage area are saturated oil) the PI can be farily approximated  by some analytical correlations.

Multiphase IPR

...


For 3-phase water-oil-gas flow the IPR analysis is perfomed on oil and watr components (see Fig. 4.1 and Fig. 4.2).

...