Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

WFP – Well Flow Performance is performed on stabilised wellbore and reservoir flow and does not cover transient behavior which is one of the primary subjects of Well Testing domain.


Note
Expand
titleMore on stabilised reservoir and wellbore flow


The wellbore flow is called stabilised if the delta pressure across wellbore is not changing over time.

The formation flow is called stabilised if the well productivity index is not changing over time.


It's important to remember the difference between constant rate formation flow and stabilised formation flow.

Anchor
ConstantRate
ConstantRate


The stabilised formation flow may go through a gradually changing flow rate due to formation pressure change, while the productivity index stays constant.

On the other hand, the constant rate formation flow may not represent a stabilised formation flow as the bottom-hole pressure and productivity index maybe still in transition after the last rate change.


The WFP methods are not applicable if the well flow is not stabilised even if the flow rate is maintained constant. 


There are two special reservoir flow regimes which are both stabilised and maintain constant flow rate:  steady state regime (SS) and pseudo-steady state regime (PSS).


The steady state regime (SS)  regime is reached when the flow is stabilised with the full pressure support at the external boundary.


The pseudo-steady state (PSS) regime is reached when the flow is stabilised  with no pressure support at the external boundary.


In both above cases, the drawdown and flow rate will stay constant upon productivity stabilisation.


As for formation and bottom-hole pressure in PSS they will be synchronously varying while in SS they will be staying constant.


The table below is summarizing the major differences between SS and PSS regimes.



Steady state regime (SS)Pseudo-steady state (PSS)
Boundary
Full pressure supportNo pressure support
Productivity index

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyJ(t) = \frac{q}{\Delta p}

constant

constant

Flow rate

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyq(t)

constant

constant

Drawdown

LaTeX Math Inline
body\Delta p(t) = p_e(t) - p_{wf}(t)

constant

constant

Botom-hole pressure

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_{wf}(t)

constant

varying

Formation pressure

LaTeX Math Inline
bodyp_e(t)

constant

varying



It's again important to avoid confusion between the termines stationary conditions (which mean that refered properties are not chaning in time) and stabilised flow conditions which may admit pressure and rate vraition.


In practice, the productivity index is usually not known at all times as there is no routine procedure to assess it.

It is usually accepted that a given formation takes the same time to stabilise the flow after any change in well flow conditions and the stabilisation time is assessed based on the well tests analysis.

Although, this is not strictly true and the flow stabilisation time depends on well-formation contact and reservoir property variation around a given well.

This is also compromised in multi-layer formations with cross-layer communication. 




The conventional WFP – Well Performance Analysis is perfomed as the 

LaTeX Math Inline
body\{ p_{wf} \ {\rm vs} \ q \}
cross-plot with two model curves:

...