...
Oil Depletion
The EUR during the natural oil depletion can be assessed with the following formula:
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
EUR_{ND} = \frac{Q_o}{V_o} = \frac{ (p_i - p_{wf}) \, c_t}{(1-s_{wi})\, B_o} =
\frac{ (p_i - p_{wf}) }{(1-s_{wi})\, B_o} \, \big( c_r + s_{wi} c_w + (1-s_{wi})c_o \big) |
where
is flowing bottom-hole pressure, – initial formation pressure, – formation volume factor for oil, – cumulative oil production, – STOIIP, – initial water saturation in oil pay....
The total compressibility of oil saturated formation
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
c_t = \frac{1}{V_{\phi}} \frac{\partial V_{\phi}}{\partial p} = c_r + s_{wi} c_w + (1-s_{wi})c_o |
and can be split into rock, water, oil components:
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
c_t = c_r + s_{wi} c_w + (1-s_{wi})c_o |
For low compressible oil, the total compressibility can be assumed constant
and the volume reduction can be related to pressure decline as:| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
\frac{\delta V_\phi}{V_\phi} = c_t \, \delta p = c_t \, (p_i - p_{wf \, min}) |
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
\delta V_\phi = Q_o \, B_o |
and
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
V_o = s_o \, V_\phi = (1-s_{wi}) \, V_\phi |
hence
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
\frac{Q_o \, B_o \, (1-s_{wi})}{V_o} = c_t \, (p_i - p_{wf \, min}) |
and
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
EUR = \frac{Q_o}{V_o} = \frac{ (p_i - p_{wf \, min}) \, c_t}{(1-s_{wi})\, B_o} |
For the naturally flowing wells the production bottom hole pressure can be assessed as:
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
p_{wf} = p_s + \rho_g \, g\, h + \bigg( 1- \frac{\rho_g}{\rho_o} \bigg) \, p_b |
where
– tubing-head pressure defined by the production gathering system, – is the true vertical depth at formation top, | LaTeX Math Inline |
|---|
| body | \{ \rho_o, \, \rho_g \} |
|---|
|
– oil and gas densities, – bubble-point pressure.Gas Depletion
The Expected Ultimate Recovery during the natural gas depletion can be assessed with the following formula:
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
EUR_{GD} = \frac{Q_g}{V_g} = 1- \frac{p_{wf}}{p_i} |
Water flooding
Motivation = maintain formation pressure at sweep interface
The Expected Ultimate Recovery during the waterflood sweep can be assessed with the following formula:
| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
EUR_{WF} = E_S \, E_D + (1-E_S) EUR_{ND} |
where
– displacement efficiency, – sweep efficiency....
Water-Oil displacement efficiency
...
See also
...
Petroleum Industry / Upstream / Production / Subsurface Production / Reserves Depletion
Physics / Fluid Dynamics / Percolation / Reservoir flow / Reservoir flow drive mechanisms
[ Field Development Plan ]
Reference
...
| Show If |
|---|
|
| Panel |
|---|
| bgColor | papayawhip |
|---|
| title | ARAX |
|---|
|
|
...
Gas flooding
Motivation = maintain formation pressure at sweep interface with gas in case of high water mobility
| LaTeX Math Inline |
|---|
| body | \frac{k_{rw}}{\mu_w} \gg \frac{k_{ro}}{\mu_o} |
|---|
|
which makes waterflood inefficient....
WAG flooding
Motivation = maintain formation pressure at sweep interface with alternating inejction of water and gas in case of high residual oil to water sweep is high
and gas sweep is less than to water sweep .| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
E_D = \frac{1-s_{wi}-s_{org}}{1-s_{wi}} |
Chemical EOR
Motivation = maintain formation pressure at sweep interface with chemical injection and reduce residual oil to EOR sweep
| LaTeX Math Inline |
|---|
| body | s_{or \, eor} < s_{orw} |
|---|
|
.| LaTeX Math Block |
|---|
|
E_D = \frac{1-s_{wi}-s_{ori}}{1-s_{wi}} |
where
– inititial water in oil pay, – residual oil to injection sweep. CО2 injection
Reference
[1]
