Expand | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Objectives
Definition
Excerpt Include | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Different OH sensors have complex correlation to effective porosity, shaliness and pore-saturating fluids.
The density, neutron, sonic and resistivity tools show a monotonous correlation to porosity and shaliness.
The density, and neutron tools exhibit a linear correlation while sonic and resistivity tools exhibit non-linear correlation to porosity and shaliness.
Excerpt Include | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Excerpt Include | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sonic Porosity
WGG Equation (Wyllie)
The WGG sonic porosity
equation is : LaTeX Math Inline body \phi_s
LaTeX Math Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
\frac{1}{V_{p \ log}} = \frac{1-\phi_s \ C_p}{V_{p \ m}} + \frac{\phi_s \ C_p}{V_{p \ f}} |
where
LaTeX Math Inline | ||
---|---|---|
|
LaTeX Math Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
C_p = \frac{V_{shс}}{V_{sh}} |
where
LaTeX Math Inline | ||
---|---|---|
|
LaTeX Math Inline | ||
---|---|---|
|
GGG Equation (Gardner, Gardner, Gregory)
The GGG sonic porosity
equation is : LaTeX Math Inline body \phi_s
LaTeX Math Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
\frac{1}{V^{1/4}_{p \ log}} = \frac{(1-\phi_s)}{V^{1/4}_{p \ m}} + \frac{\phi_s}{V^{1/4}_{p \ f}} |
The above equation is based on the Gardner correlation for sonic density:
LaTeX Math Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
\rho_s = 171 \cdot V_{p \ m}^{1/4} |
where
is measured in LaTeX Math Inline body \rho_s
and LaTeX Math Inline body \rm \big[ \frac{m^3}{kg} \big]
is measured in LaTeX Math Inline body V_{p \ m} LaTeX Math Inline body \rm \big[ \frac{m}{\mu s} \big]
and mass balance equation:
LaTeX Math Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
\rho_s = (1-\phi_s)\rho_m + \phi_s \rho_f |
RHG Equation (Raymer, Hunt, Gardner)
The RHG sonic porosity
equation is : LaTeX Math Inline body \phi_s
LaTeX Math Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
V_{p \ log} = (1-\phi_s)^2 V_{p \ m} + \phi_s V_{p \ f} |
and only valid for
LaTeX Math Inline | ||
---|---|---|
|
Cross-Porosity Analysis
Neutron vs Density
| for oil/water saturated formations | |||||||
| for gas saturated formations |
Sonic vs Density
SPHI is usually not sensitvie to second porosity development while DPHI accounts for it proportionally.
This means formation units with secondary porosity development will show DPHI growing over SPHI.
Reference
Show If | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
[1] http://petrowiki.org/Porosity_evaluation_with_acoustic_logging [2] http://pangea.stanford.edu/~jack/GP170/Reading%231.pdf Open_Hole_Wireline_logging.pdf
Gardner, G.H.F., Gardner, L.W., and Gregory, A.R., 1974, Formation velocity and density -- the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps: Geophysics, 39, 770-780. Raymer, L.L., Hunt, E.R., and Gardner, J.S., 1980, An improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform: SPWLA 21 Ann. Logging Symp., July 8-11, 1980, 1-12. |